DonFerrari said:
Yes all games scores should be considered equally (even if I personally think Nintendo scores are inflated and that a lot of points taken from franchises on other consoles are overlooked on Nintendo), so yes GTS suffered low score on reviews (reason I were saying the reviewers were doing a very lousy job, which can also be the case for SoT). I don't consider GTS a bad game (and neither that it have low content), and also didn't say SoT is a bad game (unless you can find any quote saying this). What I said and repeat is that the score is low and that for a long time 70 and below on VGC was considered a bad score (and sure enough if I didn't know about the game a 69 score would probably prevent me from buying it, as probably someone that doesn't know GT would put other games in front on priority list due to score). |
Too many gamers on this site just want all there games to be perfect and anything below a 9 is insulting. Some of my favourite games of all time are in the 80s by critics. I couldn't care less if its a 90/100 or a 60/100 if I can enjoy it I will play it. I personally say 7 isn't a bad score, its an average score, if it was a bad score it would be marked in Red on Metacritic.