By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dark_Feanor said:
DonFerrari said:

So after admitting PS3 was a tech nightmare you rest you case of Sony ALWAYS using proved technologies and architetures?

You should rest your mind.

Did you even bother to read my post or read the links? You should have tried harder.

I will write one more and last time. It can´t be clear than that.

The only time Sony used, or tried to use unproven* technologies they almost killed the company. They went from an 80% market share to roughly 33%.

The story is narrated here https://www.amazon.com/Race-New-Game-Machine-Playstation/dp/0806531010 

*I have to be fair, the PS3 PowerPC core was proven in workstations and Apple PCs. The real killers were the SPEs and Blu Ray.

You can rephrase as many times as you want, but you were the one who said "Nintendo, MS and Sony will always use proven technology and architetures" so any single case of they not doing that already breaks your argument, so stop trying to win the argument by shouting.

Dark_Feanor said:
DonFerrari said:

So if anyone looked at your 2000 posts they wouldn't ever find you using MS financial power as a mean to win gen 8?

Alas, this has nothing to do with my posts in this threads, and it is a "non sequitur", pointless to this discussion in 2018... 

Be my guest. But you have to find the full thread, with the full context and my post has to be a clear affirmation:

"Microsoft WILL WIN the 8 gen BECAUSE it has MORE money."

However. 
If I had more time to lose, I can check for many, many posts of people claiming Microsoft would simply abandon the Xbox One. Or that would be outsold by the WiiU... 

Oh boy, so many memories of 2012/2013. I with ethomaz was here. He would be proudly showing leaks of Semiaccurated and twits from Thuway (was that the name of that Pakistani medical student?)

It isn't pointless. If MS infinite money didn't made they take loses on X1 to win more market, you can't use their money as an evidence that they would do so for any future generation.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."