rocketpig said:
phil said:
rocketpig said:
DragonLord said:
rocketpig said:
DragonLord said:
If a ps3 game receives a score of 5.5 or so from Rocketpig or Twestern, then it is most likely an 8.5 or higher in most other peoples books. |
Yeah, because I mark down PS3 games because they're on a Sony console.
Nice troll job, BTW. You don't even have the slightest idea what I would give MGS4. Here's a hint: it's higher than 8/10. That could change depending on the ending but other than the story and dialogue, my impressions of the game are overwhelmingly positive.
But if it makes you feel better to think that people care enough to mark down games from a console they own just to spite fanboys, go for it. Paranoia rules, yo.
|
Lol, I actually prefer the 360 over the ps3 personally. I really do. I'm a jrpg fan and the ps3 doesn't have shit on the ps3--plain and simple fact. And not much coming in the foreseeable future. However, the 360 has lots of good JRPG's coming soon and Lost Odyssey is my favorite game of the next-gen. I've been banned from ps3forums and am actually posting over at Teamxbox recently. So I'm not much of a "Sony" fanboy.
I didn't mean it rudely. I meant it as a joke. So don't get so damn defensive and offended.
|
Ah, I misunderstood. My apologies.
It's not out of the ordinary for PS3 fanboys to assault me in this forum. I've done a good job of attacking their sacred cow on many occasions.
|
Hahahaha! Don't think so highly of yourself. Your problem isn't that you attack anyone's sacred cows, it's your utter hypocrisy. Your nitpicking of little bullshit details in PS3 games even if they don't matter, but seeming forgiveness of the same problems on every god damned 360 game ever released.
If you're so fucking clever, how is it you completely utterly failed to realize that the cutscenes in MGS are skippable, especially after you said they were the biggest problem? Because you're a troll whose full of shit.
|
Exactly what 360 game faults do I overlook? I think you're confusing "nitpicking" with "glaring game faults". If anyone here is overlooking faults in titles to make a system look better, it's you. I just call it like I see it.
Yet another PS3 owner telling me to skip the cutscenes... Yes, next time someone tells me about a movie they didn't like, I'll tell them to skip the first half of it if they don't like it but God forbid, do not complain about it if it was bad. Cheesy dialogue? Skip it. Awkward plot holes? Skip 'em. Horrible acting? Aw fuck it all, skip the whole damned thing. It's the lamest cop-out excuse to prevent someone from pointing out that MGS may not be as great as many of you like to think. Besides, I'm overall very positive about the game... But people like you don't notice things like that. You would rather classify everyone who attacks Your Precious as a "troll" for fear that they might have a valid point.
Nice personal insults, BTW. See you in two days.
PS. How do I "skip" mentally retarded AI? Just curious.
|
You're analogy is invalidated by the fact that you always refer to MGS titles as "games" rather than interactive movies. As such it is purely the gameplay that it should be judged by with the cutscenes being a nice bonus albeit skippable to those who do not enjoy them.
If you disliked the preachy dialogue at the end of SoL than you probably won't think better of MGS4, though I think some issues aside the ending (or at least the dialogue) was brilliant perhaps even surpassing the deeply thought provoking narrative of MGS2.
