Ryuu96 said:
You seem to be the one getting annoyed, people are responding to you because you are wrong, Shika stated that "it got a 69 meta which is pretty average" You responded that it's not an average score, since we're talking about Metacritic this is what we're basing it off: http://www.metacritic.com/about-metascores
It's much closer to 74 than it is 50 so I'm pretty sure that would fall into the 'Average' range by Metacritic's standards, It's also much closer to a 7 than a 6, even if it is in the 60's, unless you can point out where Metacritic states that 'Average' only starts in the 70's then I suggest you drop this conversation. Edit - Not to mention that we also have a Metacritic topic, which this isn't it. |
I think this shit is hilarious. I've just been replying to elaborate on earlier posts and offer rebuttals. Some resorted to ad hominem or saying that I bash ms games all the time. *sigh
7 is considered average in most 10 point review systems. A high 6 is still not a 7. I'm not wrong on that. Even what you sourced said it's a mixed review score. *shrugs I'm gonna take your advice and stop replying since people are getting mad enough that ya guys are getting involved.
