By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation on 29 March 2018
Edit Thread
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Azzanation said:

I think the problem is too many no name heroes like to dish out opinions based off others rather than there own personal experience.

If you take his word for it than you clearly would take a reviewers word for it if they havnt played the game. Thats honestly how dumb it sounds. 

For the record there are also gamers out there enjoying it after 4 hours so each to there own.

The game is niche and dont judge it until you play it. That goes with all games. 


"Would you take a reviewer seriously if they came out and scored/reviewed a game that they havnt played?"

Do you realize how contradictory this is to this: 

"How do you give an opinion on something you havnt played? Please explain."

Reviewers are there to review products for people who HAVEN'T bought the product. You're simultaneously saying you can't judge a game without playing it(a.k.a. most of the people who care about reviews), but then saying that you wouldn't trust a reviewer who hasn't played the game they're reviewing ... implying you do trust reviews and take their opinions seriously when judging the game... 

Anyways that analogy is pretty bad. No one cares about a random persons opinion that much on an internet forum. And most people don't care about most reviewers, they only care about a select few. 

Would you read a review on a game that the reviewer hasnt played? Thats exactly how some people sound in here. Just like i wouldnt listen to randoms shouting claims and unprofessional opinions on the net. 

Reviews are guidelines nothing more.

It makes perfect sense. 

Last edited by Azzanation - on 29 March 2018