By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Snoorlax on 27 March 2018
Edit Thread
GorillaQc said:

1. Goku is NOT a video game character.

2. If he was included, what would be next ? Eric Cartman ? Naruto ? Mickey Mouse ? I'm serious, if you start breaking the rules for 1 character, you'll need to start doing it for others.

3. Most Important point: Video Game characters should at the very least have priority over everything else.

I'm not completely against Goku in Smash, but actual video game characters should have priority over him. In this order
Nintendo Characters >>>>> 3rd party characters >>>>>>>>>> Whatever else you want.

Edit : Also, the ROB argument is stupid. Sure, ROB started off as a "toy" but it was created by Nintendo as an "accessory" for the Famicom so it's a nintendo character, and arguably, a video game "character". The fact is, he was created by Nintendo so he's a nintendo character.

- No, you don't need to. If there is enough fan demand then people will vote for those characters.

- That's how it always has been and nobody is trying to change that.

- I guess the Gameboy camera is videogame character.

NightlyPoe said:
Snoorlax said:

AngryLittleAlchemist  pretty much already told you most of what i wanted to say. But here is one somewhat hypocritical point you made it was initially just Nintendo characters then they expanded to 3rd party which you're okay with. It doesn't matter if it feels more all star or not, that's not what it originally was and honestly Goku joining the game wouldn't change anything about Smash as a game.

Who are you to say what matters and what does not?

Anyway, you seem to have difficulty understanding the meaning of words when you make accusations, like your trouble with the word cliche earlier.  If I feel one thing is in the spirit of the series and the other is not, when one is obviously further out of the realm of the original idea of the series, that's not hypocrisy.

To use a real-world example.  It's not hypocrisy if someone thinks the drinking age should be lowered to 18, but doesn't think it should be lowered to 12.

It doesn't matter because it already changed the original premise of the series, and that's where your hypocrisy comes in.

What you're saying is: This guy stole just 1 dollar so i wont punish him, but the other guy stole 100 he should be punished! You are okay with one but not with the other both of whom are essentially doing the same thing, in Smash' case: bringing more variety to the game.

Who am i? just another fan.