Dragon Ball Super or Dragon Ball GT

[Azuren]

Arminillo said:
GT did not commit character assassination on the majority of its supporting cast.

Right, because they practically weren't there. Everyone knows GT stands for Goku Time.

GT did not omit an entire transformation for funsies.

Which one exactly did Super omit?

GT brought Cell back even though hes "hard to draw"

And Super brought back Frieza, and infinitely more iconic villain.

GT did Android 17 first.

GT also did Android 17 worse.

GT had the better fusion.

Potara Fusion is not only stronger, but less silly. And you wanna talk about character assassination? Gogeta is a fucking joke.

GT aged Trunks and Goten.

How is this a positive or negative? The series take place at different points on their timelines.

GT had new transformations that actually made sense.

"So he's covered in red fur, grows his tail back temporarily, and goes from bite-size to Goku sized?" ||| "Makes sense to me."

I was always of the belief that GT is the SW Prequels of DB. Fantastic idea, bad execution.