fatslob-:O said:
Wyrdness said:
I've given legit reasoning on why the aligned sales differ and the numbers during the different prices back me up you on the other have no counter to the argument other than mix mash of flawed responses and example is in your very first sentence where you're bringing up the sales of the line up despite the fact that you were trying to say the line ups are different in quality. The better sales in the Switch line up highlight my point further than the strategy for the platform is working far better and this is with out the need of emergency price cuts.
Yeah sure you're ruffled by them mate hence why you brought them up, it's tactic employed by someone unable to gain any ground in a debate so they bring up something or someone unrelated, the fact that you don't even mention any name further null and voids this part of your post because you know but mentioning their name you not only become subject to them but things like context and such then come into play which can further be used to shoot your notion down.
|
LOL, my post wasn't about the why and neither am I interested in arguing about it either ...
You just tried to change the goal posts and find an excuse ...
|
Another classic side step by someone with no response, moved goal posts when the context doesn't even apply, my post highlighted the price cut and effect it had you had no response to it, you tried bringing up line up then it was highlighted that the line ups were of equivalent quality at which point you tried bringing up sales of the line up which is ironically irrelevant to the argument at hand. It's not moving goal posts by me it's a red herring attempt by yourself.
Want an example of what moving goal posts is try your own post in another thread where you tried arguing only 2 Nintendo platforms had sold 100m while saying the GB doesn't count.
