By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jumpin said:
Insidb said:

TROLOLOLOLOLOL:

https://www.cinemablend.com/new/Your-Guide-James-Cameron-Many-Avatar-Lawsuits-Which-Might-Actually-Work-36439.html

https://io9.gizmodo.com/a-history-of-plagiarism-claims-against-james-cameron-690974718

 

Also, "there remains a nagging suspicion that the plot of Avatar borrowed more surreptitiously from less litigable source material: the epic Kevin Costner western Dances With Wolves or the animated musical FernGully: The Last Rainforest, for instance, both of which feature native tribes who come under threat from outsiders and a central romance between a local female and a sympathetic member of the invading race:"

https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2017/jun/06/avatar-why-no-one-cares-about-a-sequel-to-the-worlds-most-successful-movie

Ever see a movie that features a superhero battling a super villain?
Are you saying that story is less common and therefore more original than Avatar?

You've fallen into the trap of confirmation bias. You believe something, and you find an article that points out something that you think proves your belief; then you ignore the abundance of widely available evidence that disproves your belief.

I've shared several articles that verify my point that many other posters have stated; that's not confirmation bias: it's called, "consensus," and I'm sorry it disagrees with you.

My point is LITERALLY the opposite of your ridiculous argument: Avatar VERY CLOSEY mimics other films, not very generally. By manufacturing a argument and dismissing the evidence, you're not showing confirmation bias. That would require that you provide selectively-chosen evidence; you're just running with ignorance, willful or otherwise.

It's not a good look.