| Wyrdness said: Except price is relevant because the 3DS was behind during the period it had the higher price you know why because Switch off the bat is a more appealing device even at its current price. 3DS required a 50 quid price cut to get into gear even though its launch price was still 50 quid lower than what the Switch is, cutting the price early for 3DS was never the intended strategy for it. |
What's also relevant is the Switch's stronger software lineup overtime compared to the 3DS but that doesn't make the comparison any less apt ...
Even though a price cut wasn't intended for the 3DS's strategy that's just how it played out but we also shouldn't assume that Nintendo will take a similar path in pricing strategy because that already isn't so when their paths diverged for sometime and quite frankly, an apples to apples comparison can never be made between two different systems however that doesn't mean we can't statisically isolate the market performance between them ...
It's also intriguing that you've taken a standpoint from a certain someone in this community to focus on the nuances ...
