By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
John2290 said:
Aeolus451 said:

I edited the post (a little too late). I just don't want progressivism in gaming because it ruined other hobbies. Hobbies are meant to be a retreat so you can relax and forget about the real world for a bit. 

I'm sure you only hate it because you have been force fed it or have only noticed it because of bad implementation. I agree with you however saying that as a blanket statement is akin to censorship, every avenue should be open to the creative team of any medium. I understand you want ND to play it safe but at what cost does playing it safe come, it could easily start including violence or anything sexual. At what point do you then just end up with a bland ass story?

Sorry, progressivism per se sucks... but if a game developer want to portray gay people, black protagonist or fight against animals abuse in a way that makes sense and makes a compelling story than that is valid... the point I believe our friend doesn't want is that they are doing that out of coercion from SJW or to put an individual agenda on the game. Because we already have seem how bad that hit a game.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."