SpokenTruth said:
I didn't dismiss his conclusion because he's not brown but because he's not subject to the systematic racism he claims doesn't exist. It's the lack of experience, not the lack of color. And yes, anecdotes are admissible as they are they are relevant to the issue. They are needed to realize the systemic nature of it all. |
You did exactly that. He's not brown therefore he can't experience the so called systematic racism that you claim exists therefore his opinion doesn't matter. You're wrong on that and it's a bit racist.
If it's systematic then it can be proven with actual data and verifiable facts rather than with bogus anecdotes. This is not a joking or casual matter. You have show actual proof to claim something like that.