| DonFerrari said: I read what he said, and after reading and seeing he was wrong I put it as SJW shenanigan, not the other way around. And when you are giving OPINION you don't go there and put a "specialist" to reinforce it unless you want to make it a fact. His opinion on the first half of the review is worth a merit because it discuss the game and funny enough he likes the game (which later he will say he wouldn't recommend because the creator is racist and the game lacks diversity). I rather evaluate his review than trying to either give it more weight or bash based on his historic (that would be prejudice on the review). So his second half which is he upholding his agenda is what becomes not worth. |
What is the proof that he is wrong. Did you do your own history search during that time period. Have you actually followed the developer of the game and know his history. I believe if you want to validate your opinion you definitely do you homework and that would be to check with someone who knows the period of time. Just because its an opinion doesn't mean it should not be an informed one.
One of the reason I read reviews instead of just looking at a score because I want to know what the reviewer thought about a game and what are their pros and cons. Not all the time do I agree or care about some pros or cons. If I care about a certain developer and their behavior which I do not agree with then that could be a reason for me to not support their game. Its a reasonable thing to bring up, the only thing is if the claims are valid.
