| zorg1000 said: Having a great game every 3-4 months is not enough to make hardware succeed if the software output is slow, the hardware features are unappealing, the device is poorly designed, the marketing/advertising sucks and the price is high for what the product offers. |
Even after discounting the Vita (frankly just it's brand name alone was great advertisement for the system), how do you explain PS1's sudden rise to popularity after it's underwhelming launch and 1st year performance ? (couldn't get great reception initially)
Your point about advertising/marketing is clearly bunk regardless since it's not a high factor or indicator to a platforms success ...
| zorg1000 said:
So yes, its a lame excuse to say, "this game didnt sell this console so why would it sell that console?" when there are multiple other factors at play. |
The only other factor at play is launch price since it's the only aspect shown to have any correlation to a platforms success aside from it's library, everything else is just noise ...
| RolStoppable said: fatslob already implicitly admitted in this thread that he knows that he is posting rubbish and only does it to get a rise out of people. |
LOL, I didn't know I had you under my fingertips ... (I cherish the fact that I can trigger you at any moment intentionally or not 
)
