| Nuvendil said: There will not be a Switch that can't switch. |
How do you know? Have you visited the future?
The 3DS didn't have 3D.
The Gameboy Advance had a revision that was a clam-shell design.
The 2DS wasn't a clam-shell design.
There is zero physical reason why there can't be a "Switch that doesn't Switch" except that you disagree with the concept.
And that means you don't have an argument.
| Nuvendil said: Also, enlarging or shrinking the unit is almost certainly out of the question. It would lead to Joycon incompatibility. |
Who cares? With the Nintendo DSi, Nintendo abolished the Gameboy Advance Slot, which actually BROKE compatibility between some DS games/accessories.
Besides. You can enlarge the screen and retain Joycon functionality, it doesn't have to fit flush with the screen you know, Nintendo does have Engineers which are intelligent.
| Nuvendil said: Also, the problem with the SP design is that it would cost the system two inputs since circle pads, by their very design, cannot be clickable. Which would cause game compatibility issues. |
Why should it be any different than the current Switch? Please. Enlighten me.
| Nuvendil said: The whole entire point of the Switch's existence is bridging home console and handheld gaming. And it has been a big success on that foundation. Dropping that would be foolish. |
No one is saying to "drop it". - You can have variations of a platform that cater to different demographics/needs/wants/desires and you know... Sell even more units and stuff?
I mean. Nintendo did it with the 3DS.. They released the 2DS, then the New 3DS XL, then the New 2DS XL and so on.
People are all different and want different things, sorry to break it to you... But other peoples needs/wants/desires can and will deviate from your own.
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
