Aeolus451 on 28 February 2018
| Tulipanzo said: My two cents: A review is supposed to be communicating to readers information that may be of interest regarding purchase. Now, since not every person thinks the same, those standard may vary. To me, the fact that this dev let his own politics come in the way of the mission statement of the game, historical realism, is enough to give me pause. That the guy aligned himself with a known hate group leads me to avoid the game completely. To you, this is not a problem. This is fine. What is not fine is you demanding the reviewer avoid mentioning the head honcho's politics, despite those directly affecting the resulting game, because you feel they are not a selling point. It would be akin to ignoring that, say, MG Survive was mostly based on the work of a previous team, unceremoniously fired after their last project, because it makes Konami look bad. The only difference here is you think him right There are many reviews which completely ignore this; I dare say that Eurogamer are in the minority by just mentioning this. It makes it all the more laughable that one review sent you crying back to the forums about the mean sjws. |
Crying to? This forum has alot of lefties. Hardly sounds like a place an anti-sjw would seek protection. There's more than a few reviews bitching about the silly crap.
