By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
potato_hamster on 26 February 2018
Edit Thread
CosmicSex said:
DonFerrari said:

He pointed pretty clear what he have against the review.

The reviewer used a single source that give a "what if 0,001%" chance scenario to ask why the dev didn't include a black person and then go to a personal attack of the dev preferences, his stance against gamergate, censorship and using a band T-shirt... have you read the thread or just decided to attack OP?

He says:

"We know of African kings in Constantinople on pilgrimage to Spain; we know of black Moors in Spain; we know of extensive travel of Jews from the courts of Cordoba and Damascus; we also know of black people in large cities in Germany," the historian, Sean Miller, tells me. Czech cities Olomouc and Prague were on the famous Silk Road which facilitated the trade of goods all over the world. If you plot a line between them, it runs directly through the area recreated in Kingdom Come. "You just can't know nobody got sick and stayed a longer time," he says. "What if a group of black Africans came through and stayed at an inn and someone got pregnant? Even one night is enough for a pregnancy."

Its this wrong?  I am asking for you to present facts that he is wrong.

Also, you don't see anything with him supporting a convicted mureder?  You don't think anyone anywhere would see anything wrong with that unless they are SJW because according to you everyone is okay with racial killings?

To even suggest that this guy may have a racial issue or even an issue with 'good taste' doesn't make one and SJW.  I suppose when you hear about people being targeted or killed for their ethnicity, it is just supposed to wash over you like a caressing breeze and you are supposed to automatically go out and support that person lol.  Okay bud.

The only reason why any of the PoC thing is even important is because the biggest thing this game is supposed to be know for is historical accuracy. 

Don't try to pin me down with auto hate and misdirection.  I don't respond to that.  Give me facts of the era and then tell me if the reviewer has a point in his criticism.   You had a point with about him having one source.  That is a correct argument to make against his claim.  You are using facts.    That is all I care for here.  What historian do you have to contradict the one sited here?

Well for one... it doesn't appear that the silk road came anywhere near what is now known as the Czech Republic according to the sources I found.

Here's a map according to Wikipedia:


The Czech Republic would be well above the "E" in Europe. That's just one of the apparent historians points that means that people of color *could have possibly*  passed through the area. Perhaps. Maybe. As in "not a historical fact that they did".

So there's that.