sundin13 said:
1) If I've explained it once, I've explained it 100 times. I am not saying that there is no connection, but instead, that phenotypic variation does not necessarily speak to similar variation in genes not controlling for that small subset of characteristics. 2/3) No, I think that is just you for some reason refusing to understand a point that I've explained 100 times. I have never claimed that skin color is not a genetic trait, only that such small genetic variation is not sufficient to separate the species into distinct races. I don't know why this is so hard to understand. 4) That is pretty much by definition, a non-argument, which does not address my question. |
"that phenotypic variation does not necessarily speak to similar variation in genes not controlling for that small subset of characteristics. "
well we can safely say that 99% of the time a black person has dark skin because of their genetic makeup, that's the point
and again that's one of the factors (all of which are biological) people take into consideration when identifying races
" I have never claimed that skin color is not a genetic trait, only that such small genetic variation is not sufficient to separate the species into distinct races."
and yet we do, whenever someone says "black person" everyone understands what they are referring to, which is, a differentiation from a white person or an asian person
you can deny reality but the fact remains that this has happened, is happening and will continue to happen regardless of whether you close your eyes and stick you fingers in your ears
you can play this silly relativistic game with terms all you like but reality remains unchanged
" I don't know why this is so hard to understand. "
i understand your argument, i'm just saying that its dumb
me not agreeing with you does not mean that i don't understand what you are saying
" That is pretty much by definition, a non-argument, which does not address my question."
our interactions with each other are inexorably linked to appearance, we always take appearance into consideration when we interact with other people
your question relies on the assumption that we can just divorce our perception with regards to how we perceive each other from appearance
so your question is nonsensical, it doesn't take reality into consideration
there's also other factors like people tending to have an in-group preference with regards to those who look like they do that are all linked right back into this, that you aren't even acknowledging but regardless they do play an integral role in how people interact







