DonFerrari said:
I really can't see why the telegraphic example would be more near and valid than this one... or have you registered for your self the use of not 1:1 analogy? |
What has this got to do with an analogy? It isn't an analogy, just faulty logic.
Grid girls being deemed necessary at some Formula racing venues does not mean they are necessary at all Formula racing venues. Of course, grid girls being deemed unnecessary at some Formula racing venue also does not mean that they are uneccesary at all Formula racing venues , but that was never implied. Grid girls being deemed uneccesary at a single Formula racing venue is enough to show that grid girls aren't absolutely necessary to have a Formula racing tournament. As I explained, they may be necessary for some (for whatever reason), but they are empirically not absolutely necessary to have a formula racing tournament.








