Feminists outrage at walk on/Grid girls, F1 & Darts models ban. Your thoughts?

[Teeqoz]

Aura7541 said:

DonFerrari said:

No sorry...

A company removing a position because it's unneeded isn't like a company retaining a position because it is needed. Only the points that strength my argument shall be used, reverse or equivalence that weakens it isn't acceptable, so don't try to rule out my argument using further evidence that disproves it /obvious sarcasm.

And that was what I was simply trying to say all this time. But apparently, I have to go full rocket science jargon to get that point across.

Needed for Formula E and NASCAR =/= needed to have a formula racing tournament altogether. Are you unable to see that distinction? I have acknowledged that NASCAR and Formula E deemed them necessary for their companies' business, but that, once again, doesn't mean they are necessary to have a Formula racing tournament. They might be necessary for their Formula racing tournament, but not necessary for each and every one of them. Do you legitimately not see the difference between those two things?