JWeinCom said:
There was actually a full explanation of why this may not have been historically accurate... However, the OP chose to cut most of that part. |
I posted a link to the review so I wasn't hiding anything. Sorry, I assumed that anyone would read the review considering my wording in the headline. If they were too lazy to read it, I don't give one fuck about it. I can't control what people do.
The game is historically accurate as far as we know. It's not proven otherwise. I'm gonna assume that the dev is right because they put alot more research into that area and time period since they modeled the entire game off of it compared to a triggered reviewer who likely kept asking historians til he got one who said it's a possibility of a possibility of a possibility.
