By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aeolus451 said:
Teeqoz said:

What feminists own Formula 1 or a dart tournament?

Exactly how can feminists force those owners to stop them from conducting business as they want to? They can't. Simple as that. I've already explained this in another post, but unless there's a financial argument (in which case you can hardly blame "feminism", you can't force neither advertisers nor viewers to accept their policies) or the owners themselves agreed with the viewpoint and made the call themselves, there's no way this would happen.

You've never heard of social pressure? That's the main weapon of feminists.

I've heard of social pressure, but social pressure requires it to be a large enough amount of people that it'll actually impact them. And that indirectly implies it's a financial decision.

Do you really think that the poor F1 and dart tournament organizers are pushed around against their will, towards a direction that they both don't agree with and that will lose them money? In that case, it's just bad leadership.

Social pressure can lead to bad PR, which in turn will hurt them financially. But then it's the financial repercussions (which again means that there's a large enough group of people that care about this, that they are just listening to their audience). Either way you cut it, it's fundamentally a leadership decision. Not feminists.

Besides, there are other groups that are trying to exert social pressure in different directions. They're just apparently doing a worse job at it.

Last edited by Teeqoz - on 15 February 2018