Currently Online 
| o_O.Q said: "They didn't take away anything; the organizations did. " true but the feminists put pressure on the organisations leading to them taking these positions away |
Again, I contend the logic upstairs behind removing racing models was more "female viewers don't enjoy our racing models and we'll hopefully gain more female fans by removing them" than "racing models are sexist and we need to remove them to avoid bad publicity".
| o_O.Q said: "A company removing one of its gender exclusive occupations does not take away the gender's fundamental right to work." it does within that field does it not? suppose we took away the rights of women to work in STEM fields, is that now justified according to you? |
Not in racing itself; just that specific job title. Removing a job within a company that was exclusive to one sex is not a violation of/detriment to civil rights. Removing all women categorically from your company or industry would be.
| o_O.Q said: "Not enjoying racing models in your racing doesn't mean it's because the opposite sex enjoys them." i have no further comment... if you truly want to just play your part in pushing this dishonest nonsense then so be it what i'll say though is that to see a group of people attacking a fundamental aspect of what you are as a human being (out of feelings of resentment and not a drive to better society) and support them as they do so cannot ever lead to a positive outcome again you can call that a reach and i suppose it is, but i think again that its pretty obvious |
Look who's talking...
| o_O.Q said: "Which fundamental rights do they lack after these specific ~layoffs?" so you disregarded the question i was asking to reframe it as if women are not being adversely affected by this while you claim to be supporting a movement that is all about emancipating women |
My whole original point was that this decision probably wasn't about feminism in the first place; that's just what people want to point their fingers at. That line of questioning is a Red Herring. However, when you want to paint an entire/bulk/core/whatever of a movement that has objectively done gangbusters for civil rights and fairness over the years (and is still exposing injustice to this day) as an entity of hate toward half the human race (despite the majority of its followers leading normal lives and seeking healthy loving relationships with that other half), I'm inclined to speak up. Some women lost jobs over this decision, but that can happen to partial jobs when the employer want to become more impartial.
