| o_O.Q said: "In what way does an ideological group talking about an issue relevant to their group declare that it's only a serious issue when it's related to male sexuality?" there is no declaration but i think that its pretty obvious they took away the rights of these women to work.... why? because they were perceived to be sexually gratifying to men... i mean you yourself alluded to it with your "shallow" and "vapid" comments |
Whooole lot of assumptions happening here. They didn't take away anything; the organizations did. A company removing one of its gender exclusive occupations does not take away the gender's fundamental right to work. Not enjoying racing models in your racing doesn't mean it's because the opposite sex enjoys them.
| o_O.Q said: "Feminist movements have campaigned and continue to campaign for women's rights, including the right to vote, to hold public office, to work, to earn fair wages or equal pay, to own property, to receive education, to enter contracts, to have equal rights within marriage, and to have maternity leave" which of those rights do women of the present day lack? |
Which fundamental rights do they lack after these specific ~layoffs? If anything, things are more egalitarian now that neither sex is getting paid to flaunt their goodies (opening it up to men would have had a similar effect, but as I've discussed that would still add nothing to the sport).
Last edited by TallSilhouette - on 14 February 2018







