The Russian Debate

[AsGryffynn]

Goatseye said:

AsGryffynn said:

After the US already weaponized them by using anti communist propaganda against an ordoliberal government in Guatemala? Or perhaps after pressing Bolivia not to elect Evo? 

Also, the US had discredited itself when you invaded Granada under the pretext of being a security threat. Even lose cannon Margaret Thatcher chewed you out for that one. 

It's time like this I wish the Supreme Court outlawed the Republican and Democratic party from the next elections... 

Your whole argument is non sequitur and actually validates the fight of Americans against foreign intervention on political affairs. 
Try again...

Definition of Non Sequitur: 

A non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an invalid argument. In a non sequitur, the conclusion is either true or false, but the argument nonetheless asserts the conclusion to be true and is thus fallacious. 

In this case, it isn't. The US is guilty, Ad Nauseum, of wrongfully invading countries that posed no threat to it's security. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_Guatemalan_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-03-07/the-u-s-election-s-echoes-of-1996-russia

Team America just got a taste of Russian medicine. Sorry guys, but you don't f with them and not expect to fall into exactly the same trap sooner or later. There's a reason Russia exists: They are America's own personal Karma enforcer... 

Well, if the US does it, so can they...