Darwinianevolution on 14 February 2018
| Alara317 said: HAs nobody considered Nintendo? Read a lot in this thread but nothing about Nintendo. I mean, Disney, Nintendo, and Apple all have similar 'sterile yet friendly' outside personas and highly controlled images, even if I don't think their products are the same. that said, Disney and Nintendo are both friendly, and it's not like Nintendo isn't willing to do rated T material (They funded Bayonetta 2 an 3, didn't they?). Nintendo has probably the best track record for quality. Nintendo could gain SO MUCH by making Star Wars games exclusive to the Switch. Nintendo and Disney would mesh well with one another. the only thing I wouldn't like is if it was an online shooter on the switch. I love the system, but leave the FPS stuff to Sony/Microsoft (And yes, Splatoon was amazing, but it kept messing up for me and I couldn't stay in a match despite both Switch and PS4 being on the same shelf and nearly identical lengths away from the router). But between Activision and Ubisoft, I will go with Ubisoft every time. I'll take bullshots and lying about the quality of a game's graphical fidelity over predatory loot boxes and pseudo-gambling mechanics any day. Is DRM shit? yes it is, but I don't play on PC so it doesn't really affect me. Does Ubisoft have loot boxes? Somewhere, I'm sure, but not in any of the games of theirs that I play and enjoy. I don't mind open worlds with radio towers! Point is, I actually really like Ubisoft despite their questionable habits to show off versions of games that the hardware can't handle. I vote for them from the ones listed. Nintendo, ideally. Wait, what if Naughty Dog was hired to make a game? It'd be as good or better than the- I'll stop now. |
Disney wouldn't make the IP exclusive to any platform, and Nintendo wouldn't make games for systems other than their own. The only way I see a SW game by Nintendo is if Disney drops their exclusivity and just allow everyone to make SW games.
