Barozi said:
Replicant said:
Agreed. It clearly has the best MP for a GTA game but I don't think the SP missions are as memorable as in other GTA games and that's the most important thing for me personally. Furthermore, I hope that GTA6 will let you play as a single character and make switching between characters optional.
And I'm a bit disappointed with the lack of SP DLC as well.
|
eh I think the switch between the characters was the best addition in the game. The problem were the characters.
I only really liked Michael, as he was a well done and interesting character. I always like playing his missions as they mostly involved his family, with each of them being fun to watch. All of them great.
Franklin is just too boring and generic. He's got an annoying asshole friend, stupid ex-girlfriend, his auntie who rarely appears and his dog who doesn't do all that much either.
Trevor is entertaining, sure but he's such a big asshole that he comes of as unlikeable, which is probably the worst you could ask from a protagonist. I hate him. Also many of his missions suck, mostly because his home area, Sandy Shores sucks.
Then you are completely correct about the missions. They are nothing special. It boggles my mind that so many are okay with this but kept shitting on GTA4's mission design back in the day. They aren't any better. In fact, I enjoyed the missions in GTA 4 more than here. Heists being the exception. They are great, but make up only a fraction of the game.
Mission design in GTA V is often times so bad that when you start a mission, you have to drive 5 miles (in some cases up to 10 miles) to get to the point of interest and when you're finished, you have to drive all the way back just to finish the mission. Useless filler that makes the game appear longer than it is.
Game world isn't that interesting either. I really don't care about anything north of the Vinewood Hills. Paleto Bay is alright though.
|
Yep, just give me a SA remake, a modernised SA would be GOTY.
