I LOVE GIGGS said:
What are we trying to achieve on this specific discussion? I don't understand. What's wrong with having a range just in case it sold a little less or a little more than I expected?
He/she asked me about whether I think it will sell 10 million on PS4 and I said no. If you disagree with me thats fine, we can have different opinions/expectation. But I don't understand why you're acting like I lied about facts on purpose. I just added/subtracted a few hundreds to my expected number and without even calculating the percentages. I didn't know that I have to be that precise predicting future sales for a game that didn't have a history on Xbox. I apologize if that offended anyone. |
Nothing wrong with having ranges... the problem is when your ranges (even when being broad) doesn't match between each post in sequence.
I didn't say you lied, I just said your numbers don't match... if you just put you expect around 8M sales with 900k Xbox participation that would just be an expectation (that could prove right or wrong over time, no one can really be sure right now), but when you put your ranges and they are in contradiction with what you really wanted to convey then it causes some confusion.
You don't have to be precise... you could even say the game will sell between 5 and 20M (since it already made 5 and there is little to no chance of it crossing 20M) and that Xbox will be 11% of that total. It was just the line of argumentation that sounded odd.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







