Alkibiádēs said:
GhaudePhaede010 said:
The jump between Switch and PS4 is not as big as the one between Wii and PS3. Like, the jump was astronomical. It is not an objective way to compare two consoles. Let me give you an example:
I hate Warriors titles. So, what do you think Fire Emblem Warriors and Hyrule Warriors mean to me? About as much as Wii Sports means to you. Maybe less. However, a traditional Fire Emblem title, while not as good as its predecessor, is far more coveted by myself than any Warriors title. So, even if the game is rated at a 68, that is still better to me than a Warriors title rated 90. And the rating is based on games in its genre more than it is about overall experience. Otherwise, some sports games would be rated much lower if the standard they had to compete against was Zelda. This is not an objective measure in the least. You have placed how you feel about Wii Sports into this, "objective" conversation just to try dismissing my absolutely valid point.
I have seen your posts in the past. I know you are too smart to actually believe what you are saying. Which is why I keep warning people that you are trolling. I have way too much respect for you as a poster to believe you actually feel the way you do and are not trying your best to get into an argument with someone.
|
Or I genuinly think Wii Sports is a bad game?
Wii Sports Resorts, however, is a good game and what Wii Sports should have been.
|
How you feel about Wii Sports is fine by me. I have not once argued or rebutted your feelings on Wii Sports. But to then say, "objective" when you have used your subjective feelings to dismiss arguments is... to say the least, hypocritical. And I do know you to be better than that.
