Kotaku: Switch Has Three Times As Many Games as Wii U Did At This Point - And They're Better

[GhaudePhaede010]

Alkibiádēs said:

Cobretti2 said:

Why do they need to get a score of over 80%?

You do realise half those games got lower scores because the gfx were worst that PS3 and the other reason was because controls took too long to learn because it was cutting into some of the reviewers masturbation time.

At the end of the day I played the games I listed and indicated I did not care about scores. I enjoyed them. Were they perfect? no, but that's the nature of the beast it is about enjoyment not how perfect something is.

But I guess when you are a full time troll you have no time to work and earn money to buy more games so you have to rely on outdated bias methods to tell you what is and isn't a good game. Stop being brainwashed and make up your ow mind. I am my own man and make my own decision on what I like and don't like.

And the graphics on the Switch look worse than the PS4. That is not the reason those games scored lower.

This thread is about Metacritic, so strange that you're questioning it here. It's not a perfect method, but it's the most objective way of comparing the libraries of different consoles.

I owned a Wii and I already own more games on my Switch, that says more than enough.

The jump between Switch and PS4 is not as big as the one between Wii and PS3. Like, the jump was astronomical. It is not an objective way to compare two consoles. Let me give you an example:

 

I hate Warriors titles. So, what do you think Fire Emblem Warriors and Hyrule Warriors mean to me? About as much as Wii Sports means to you. Maybe less. However, a traditional Fire Emblem title, while not as good as its predecessor, is far more coveted by myself than any Warriors title. So, even if the game is rated at a 68, that is still better to me than a Warriors title rated 90. And the rating is based on games in its genre more than it is about overall experience. Otherwise, some sports games would be rated much lower if the standard they had to compete against was Zelda. This is not an objective measure in the least. You have placed how you feel about Wii Sports into this, "objective" conversation just to try dismissing my absolutely valid point.

I have seen your posts in the past. I know you are too smart to actually believe what you are saying. Which is why I keep warning people that you are trolling. I have way too much respect for you as a poster to believe you actually feel the way you do and are not trying your best to get into an argument with someone.

Last edited by GhaudePhaede010 - on 06 February 2018