By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kyuu said:
tbone51 said:

Dont give capcom to much credit lol. But this gamble paid off. The beta and Word of mouth help this out big time

So you're saying that expecting Capcom to localize the future games of what may well be their biggest franchise, is giving them too much credit?

DonFerrari said:

And they should use Switch as the lead because you want to play on Switch and not because it would sell more than the others right?

Beat it, boy. Capcom's well being is my god.

But seriously, it'd make sense if the next MH has the Switch as the lead platform considering the potential in Japan. It would save the costs and time of having to re-engineer the PS4 game to the Switch.

Man considering how much more MHW sold compared to the previous and that the graphical prowess may have had a importance on it, making the sequel a Switch lead and thus having PS4+X1 version be subpar because of it may not be the best decision.

 

Kyuu said:
tbone51 said:

Again for MHW its fine, im talking about just overall. They messed up alot especially this year with many things. Pls dont take offence to this, im talking mostly how they handled there other games recently. That includes MHXX

No offense taken, but you're just not answering my question.

He was just making fun of Capcom. Like you can't expect they to keep doing good decisions.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."