Jumpin said:
What are you on? I didn’t question that this was your opinion. I was shooting back at who your opinion is about. WHO feels that the women’s Royal Rumble match “is completely overshadowed by the Rousey signing.” You were stating it in general terms indicating that you felt other people felt this is what generally occurred, and that is what I took issue with. You then come back to me and say you were only speaking for yourself. If that’s the case, don’t word your sentence in general terms. Say something indicating that you are the one who was so excited about Rousey that it completely eclipsed the women’s Royal Rumble match (English isn’t my first language, but that is not at all what your original post looked like it was trying to say). No disclaimer necessary, just basic communication skills. |
The bolded is probably where things are going a little off course for us. I will try to be a little more clear in what I am saying for you.
To clarify, I am not excited at all about Rousey, I thought that them doing it at the time they did was in remarkably poor taste. It felt as though they just did the women's rumble match, got the checkmark on the list of "things we need to do" and then rushed to get their major headline in Rousey out there. Instead of being able to herald that they had a great and successful women's rumble the only thing people wanted to talk about (media, etc) is that Rousey is now in WWE. It takes away from the rumble they spent weeks hyping to have it all come down to a discussion primarily about a woman who wasn't even in it.
