By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Neodegenerate said:
Jumpin said:

No, it wasn't.
If you wanted to make it clear that this applies only to you, you should re-write it so it instead reads something like this:

"Thats why I hated it.  I didn't see this as a monumental first ever women's royal rumble match. Rousey signing COMPLETELY overshadowed the Rumble for me."

If you cant infer from an individuals posting on the internet that it is their opinion that is your problem, not theirs.  Not every statement needs a disclaimer so you can see it clearly.

Though based on some tweets from others, including females who participated in the match, I am not the only one with that opinion, even if I am only speaking for myself.

What are you on? I didn’t question that this was your opinion. I was shooting back at who your opinion is about. WHO feels that the women’s Royal Rumble match “is completely overshadowed by the Rousey signing.” You were stating it in general terms indicating that you felt other people felt this is what generally occurred, and that is what I took issue with.

You then come back to me and say you were only speaking for yourself. If that’s the case, don’t word your sentence in general terms. Say something indicating that you are the one who was so excited about Rousey that it completely eclipsed the women’s Royal Rumble match (English isn’t my first language, but that is not at all what your original post looked like it was trying to say).

No disclaimer necessary, just basic communication skills.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.