By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 30 January 2018
Edit Thread
vivster said:
Mnementh said:

But wait! As FFXV is a graphical improvement over FFX, that means FFX has terrible graphics too. And I'm sure a future PS5 title will have more impressive graphics, so all games ever made have terrible graphics.

I'm glad you're finally getting the gist of it. But it's still not a proper comparison. While FF games choose to be on the most powerful platform of the current gen, MH chose the by far weakest platform. Which means that even at the time of release it had terrible graphics, which wasn't true for any FF main game.

People will be sure to remind you that PS1 was weaker than N64 and PS2 was weaker than GC and Xbox. Besides PC of course.

But still I don't remember a game that could have impressed me more graphically at the time than FF IX and later one FF X and even FF XIII



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."