By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoangNhatAnh said:
DonFerrari said:

I don't think Sonic Force have costed more to develop than Ratchet and Clank. And Nintendo is know tho expend little on their development.

We are talking about third party games sales for Switch here, is Ratchet and Clank a third party? I didn't know it was already on Switch? 

So you want to talk about big games and cost but then limit it to a very limited context? Ok, distort reality as much as you want.

HoangNhatAnh said:
Megiddo said:
I said non-Nintendo AAA games. Do you consider Sonic Forces and Lego games AAA games? Also, I'm not sure what you mean by Sonic Forces being the second most expensive platforming game for the current gen systems. Surely you know of The Last Guardian and the upcoming Shadow of the Collosus remake?

The Last Guardian and the upcoming Shadow of the Collosus remake are action adventure games, platform? Yeah, sure. On Switch, Sonic is the second biggest platform game and Lego City can be considered a GTA with Lego skin and open world, you control police instead criminal. If Sonic is just childies and not AAA then Ratchet & Clank is not, either

A post before you were saying you weren't discussing Sony games... you sure change fast.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."