By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 on 26 January 2018
Edit Thread

Switch is more capable than PS3 and 360 by a considerable margin when docked, and a small but still noticeable margin when undocked. Specs don't lie.

What a lot of people seem to be overlooking with these comparisons is that games like The Last of Us and God of War 3 arrived later in the PS3's lifespan, and were built with gargantuan budgets and a strong focus on achieving the highest possible graphical fidelity. Switch hasn't even been out of a year yet, and really doesn't have any big-budget games built with graphics as the top priority.

xl-klaudkil said:
Which switch game looks better then god of war 3?

Yea,nun

GOW3 looked incredible in 2010 but it has aged and is clearly technically below what Switch can do.

GOWTLOZ said:
OTBWY said:

Hey man, not getting worked up about it. Just wanted a straight honest answer from you for once. I'm not going to argue what is factual, and enter the domain of the ridiculous. Down the road someone might get banned over something stupid like that. And if we compare track records, you might not want that... kid. Just stop and move on.

They could run Doom. But that would basically be a new build. From the ground up. But as is, they cannot run Doom 2016.

You must be an expert. Tell me more why it wouldn't run on PS3.

Because it retains most of the core rendering tech of the PS4/Xbone/PC versions; Physically Based Rendering, Subsurface Scattering, GPU accelerated particles, temporal supersampling, high quality motion blur, etc. There's simply too many advanced effects going on for a GPU from 2006 to handle.

Last edited by curl-6 - on 26 January 2018