Mandalore76 said:
Saying the Switch userbase hasn't played an Elder Scrolls game "in a lifetime" (which is what you said), does in fact presume than every person who owns a Switch has never owned a non-Nintendo system or Elder Scrolls game. That Elder Scrolls has never been on a Nintendo system, doesn't mean Switch owners haven't played the game before. I'm strictly speaking in general. Because I actually do fit your scenario. I own a Switch, and the Switch port is the first Skyrim I ever played. But, it's not because I've never had access to them. I've played Oblivion on my 360, and also on my Xbox One now through BC. |
And you explanation for why there are more people buying the VR version than Switch even with 7:1 advantage to Switch on the HW?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







