By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mandalore76 said:
DonFerrari said:

Nope, I'm infering that previous Nintendo consoles haven't had Elder's Scroll. And that for a fact there is a lot of double dippers for GTA V and Skyrim on X1 and PS4, while you don't have anything to estimate double dip on Switch... Still on the case of VR that would probably be a triple dip that would also demand the purchase of a 300+ accessory. So sorry, but that is still more impressive.

Saying the Switch userbase hasn't played an Elder Scrolls game "in a lifetime" (which is what you said), does in fact presume than every person who owns a Switch has never owned a non-Nintendo system or Elder Scrolls game.  That Elder Scrolls has never been on a Nintendo system, doesn't mean Switch owners haven't played the game before.  I'm strictly speaking in general.  Because I actually do fit your scenario.  I own a Switch, and the Switch port is the first Skyrim I ever played.  But, it's not because I've never had access to them.  I've played Oblivion on my 360, and also on my Xbox One now through BC.

And you explanation for why there are more people buying the VR version than Switch even with 7:1 advantage to Switch on the HW?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."