By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mandalore76 said:
DonFerrari said:

I do agree, still to have higher sales on a 2M base against a 13M is in itself an achievement. Even more considering PS4 base already played the skyrim on PS3 and PS4 while Switch userbase would be the first Elders Scroll in like a lifetime?

You're assuming that everyone who owns a Switch never owned a PS3/PS4, or Xbox 360/Xbox One.  Considering that Switch sales are blowing past WiiU lifetime sales, I think it's safe to say that Switch is beyond any "Nintendo console only" platform holders.

Nope, I'm infering that previous Nintendo consoles haven't had Elder's Scroll. And that for a fact there is a lot of double dippers for GTA V and Skyrim on X1 and PS4, while you don't have anything to estimate double dip on Switch... Still on the case of VR that would probably be a triple dip that would also demand the purchase of a 300+ accessory. So sorry, but that is still more impressive.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."