By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vivster said:
It didn't help that they completely changed the gameplay from the first one but I believe even as a standalone game it's not very good.

There was no standard formula for Zelda yet. They still used top down DQ style gameplay, but added rpg elements (logical step from DQ) and added side scrolling stages to A: make battles more engaging and B: platform gams were the most popular games of that era. It was completely logical at the time. Now if we look at 3D Zelda, from a certain point of view, it was a big change from the top down style of previous iterations. I like to think that Zelda II is such a game, that is comparable to the 3D games of Zelda. It was just a decade earlier.