The Fury said:
Hmm, interesting. I kinda of felt like it's goes Thor 1 and 3 about the same although Thor 3 was funnier but Thor 2 was pretty poor. It was as filler as you could get but alas, that time will come. Less said about that Whedon comment the better... I'm not a fan of him. You'll find that out soon enough. :P
Well said and some good point. You'd think an world protecting organisation which is has a huge base near New York is something Tony Stark and Pepper Potts (the weapon merchants) would know about. They don't seem to in Iron Man 1 or 2, not on how famous SHIELD actually in according to following films at least. |
Thor 1 and 2 are about the same to me. I originally remember Thor 2 being slightly better than Thor 1. Now that I've rewatched Thor 1, I like it a little better than I originally did. Not sure which one I will like better this time around. Either way they are both movies that I neither particularly love or hate. Thor 3 is definitely the best of the three, no contest.
As for SHIELD, the more I think about it, the less sense it makes. I think in the comics they get a lot of their tech from Tony Stark. Where does the MCU SHIELD get its tech from? Howard Stark is the most likely source for a lot of it, but then wouldn't they be strongly tied to Stark Industries? It doesn't make sense that Tony had no knowledge of them. If I think about this all too hard it makes my head hurt. None of it really makes sense.
curl-6 bet me that PS5 + X|S sales would reach 56m before year end 2023 and he was right.
My Bet With curl-6
My Threads:
Master Thread, Game of the Year/Decade
Switch Will Be #1 All Time
Zelda Will Outsell Mario (Achieved)
How Much Will MH Rise sell?
My Bet With Metallox