SamuelRSmith said:
Such places don't exist anywhere on the globe, except perhaps straight up warzones.
I've been through some of the shadier parts of Harlem and everything went fine, but let's not pretend that by going through there I did not accept an elevated risk of crime, and if I were to continually navigate that part of town my likelihood of being a victim would be much higher than if I chose to be in Chelsea. Here's the problem, though. You used a definition of no-go zone which is not the definition. "A "no-go area" (or "no-go zone") is an area that has a reputation for violence and crime which makes people frightened to go there" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-go_area It does not mean that going into the area warrants immediate attack, that's you putting your own definition onto the word. |
But why would anyone be frightened to go to a certain area? Unless it's in the middle of the night, no one should be afraid to go anywhere, since the chances of something bad happening to you are still very small.
In certain areas in Latin America and Africa, there's a decent chance you'll get attacked. I don't think that such places exist in Europe.
