By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
160rmf said:
GOWTLOZ said:

Switch launched at a lower price, $300 to $400. That also says it has less room for price cuts, which is why it wouldn't have good sales at the end of its lifespan like the PS4. Nintendo also brought their biggest AAA guns to Switch already in its first year, unlike the PS4 which only got a bunch of cross generation games and less successful titles in its first year.

Funny that now we're seeing these kind of statements from people with a heavy anti Nintendo bias. So you think that PS4 first year sales were possible only by pure hype?

Also, this "Nintendo already brought their biggest guns for Switch" is some kind of mantra? It's just tiresome how people repeat this over and over.

Not exactly hype, but confidence on the games that would come on the future... I bought my PS4 with only 2 games near launch, but knowing I would end the gen at near 100 as I did with PS3, 2 and 1.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."