By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Biggerboat1 said:
DonFerrari said:

I swear I heard that winning only in Europe and losing in the rest would make a WW loss...

You were already pointed to the cohesion on the approach to a high fidelity look, graphical prowess and narrative games. Your point was that Nintendo have several studios so their games can't share similarities, so I pointed you to another company that have several studios and still keep similarities.

Sure Zelda, the best story in gaming, and yes others have the wrong bias because you can clearly see quality while they only see a logo, are you for real?

Yes we are going in circles, for you someone that wouldn't buy a Switch because Nintendo games doesn't make their taste is a complete prove of hate and Bias because all Nintendo games are great and so people should like the games from Nintendo that are from the genres they like... at the same time Nintendo games are so much better than all rest that they must be more liked and sold than any in the same genre.

Your last paragraph introduces many false conclusions that only you are introducing, so I won't even bother responding to those points.

Gran Turismo is story driven? Rathcet & Clank & LBP are story driven? (I've not played those 2 but by the looks of them - doesn't seem like it...) Even the Last Guardian doesn't look particularly story driven, but again, could be wrong on that one.

So the 'cohesive approach' of Sony's Studios is 'high fidelity' and a 'focus on narrative' on some of it's catalogue... Do you know how many studios those 'approaches' would apply to? There's simply nothing unique there.

Nintendo puts just as much effort into 'graphical prowess', it's just that they are developing for much weaker hardware.

If Zelda had been released as a Sony IP, with visuals befitting the PS4, nobody would be saying - wow, this is so un-Sony... rather they'd be buying it in it's millions and giving it GOTY, just like on Switch.

So your understanding of the cohesion having those points is that all games have all of them? You are really pushing. But even so GT have the career mode that basically tells the "story" of you progressing from an Amateur to a top driver. But the graphical presentation is aligned with the others. R&C is totally cinematic and story driven, LBP also holds those modes. Last Guardian is story driven even if it doesn't have a lot of text/voice.

Nope, the focus of Nintendo isn't graphic at all, the games are polished and look pretty but they don't push graphics, that is clear to everyone. Their focus is on the gameplay aspects.

If Zelda was released on Sony it wouldn't have all the praises Nintendo fan give it, it would be a weak graphical game, the story would be bland, etc...

When you are ready to accept that as much as there are people that disregard all Nintendo games there are those that do for all 3rd parties, Sony and MS. Some had the balls to say PS4 right now doesn't have at least 5 games that are must play while Switch on its second month had 10 already (and still self named Sony fanboy). So please go away with your narrative that non-Nintendo are biased against Nintendo, but you and others Nintendo fans are unbiased, evaluating only on the merits of the game.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."