By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
peachbuggy said:
DonFerrari said:

Have I said they go and make light of their announcements? Nope, just said they wanting to sell is different than what they will formally put on their projections.

And sure, I have no issue with their 20M+ intention is sell through and not shipment.

I was talking about another rumor on VGC that had Nintendo either PRODUCING 30M to SHIP 25M or PRODUCE 25M to SHIP 20M... those are the ridiculous numbers because it would have to much on invetory. And when you said you agreed with the rumor I thought you knew which one it was.

I don't think it was a "rumour on vgchartz". Iirc the original article was sourced from the Wall street journal. There was no ethnicity pointed to in these claims though, therefore regardless of the source it still remains a rumour.

I put as rumor on VGC, as a rumor that was posted on VGC.

ethnicity??

The whole point is shipping 5M less than producing, not selling through 3M less than producing...



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."