"Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance. The only thing it cannot be is moderately important."

[Azuren]

Nem said:

Azuren said:

Well, the point of your post is fundamentally wrong on just a definitions standpoint, so there isn't much point in addressing anything else you said. It's clear you just want it to mean a certain thing, and that's fine if you want to do that, but try not to make assumptions about other people just because you're upset about not having a leg to stand on.

You were wrong. Your definition of atheism was wrong and even your excuse of the latin meaning was wrong as arfy just told me in the previous page. And btw terms don't define themselves, we do.

Your replies for the last 5 or 6 pages have been /pout after that. I made no assumption except you are poisoned with religious definitions. It's a fact, wether you are atheist or theist.

For example VG is an Atheist but his concepts are still unclear or influenced by religion. This is an educational problem at large in the US from what i know.

I'm not a good teacher. I know the logic and i know what's real and how to determine it. I did not learn specifically how to decode the way people think incorrectly and help them fix it. I apolgise, i wish i had that talent, but theres many books and atheists to talk with that will do a better job at explaining these things and i vehemently recommend them.

You were wrong. Your definition of atheism was wrong and even your excuse of the main meaning being incorrect was wrong, despite a dog telling you otherwise on a previous page. (See how easy it is to simply refute?)

 

Your replies for the last 5 or 6 pages have just been a large tantrum, and honestly I don't believe you even remember that it was an argument concerning how Agnosticism and Atheism are not the same thing. And again, you make assumptions that my character, motivations, and upbringing are religious or influenced by religion. Guess what? You're wrong again. I suppose it's just more comfortable for you to remain wrong now, since you've spent the entire thread being as much. And now you make those same assumptions about VG, all because you just can't accept that you're incorrect.

 

And you're right, you're not a good teacher. It has little to do with what you said, though, and is more accurately linked to your stubbornness. Example:

 

Guy says he's not religious. "HE CLEARLY IS BECAUSE HE DISAGREES WITH ME."

Guy says he's atheist. "HE IS CLEARLY HEAVILY INFLUENCED BY RELIGION BECAUSE HE DISAGREES WITH ME."

 

Honestly, man, the least you could do is respect when someone says they aren't religious instead of deciding that they are. I know I said you can pretend atheism means something else, but I most definitely didn't say "Hey, decide my religion so you can attempt to discredit my opinion because reasons".