The_Liquid_Laser said:
|
The_Liquid_Laser :
Your wrong. And somehow you found wrong info on the net and sourced sites on the internet to link too <.<
1) PS3 > XB360 in terms of overall performance, it was just harder to code for and make use of that extra power.
2) Switch is 376 Gflops/192 Gflops (docked/handheld Fp32)
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_Switch + math.
it works like this (shaders * 2 * clock frequency):
Switch (when docked, at full speed) :
256 cores x 2 x 0.768 (768mhz - gpu max clocks) = 393 Gflops (avg gpu clock speeds are abit lower though, hence the 376 Gflop nr)
(its probably to do with how hot it gets, and nitnendo not wanting it getting that hot, so it throttles down abit)
Switch (handheld):
256 x 2 x 0.386 (386mhz in handheld mode + boost mode) = 196 Glop (this is powerdraining mode)
256 x 2 x 0.307 (307mhz in handheld mode) = 157 Gflops (this is normal handheld mode, for less demanding games)
PS4:
1152 x 2 x 0.800 (800mhz) = 1,843 (since its over 1000, you can say Tflops, instead of Gflops) = 1.84 Tflops.
In terms of raw performance, I think its safe to say that PS4 generally has 4-5 times the specs of the Switch (when docked).
The terms of differnce in memory bandwidth ect, is really big.
"The main problem I have with these sources is that they were written before the Switch was even released. Have you considered that they might be wrong and the more modern sources are correct?" - Liquid_Laser
^ Its confirmed to be such a chip (they X-rayed it), with that amount of cores, and they can read the speeds (clocks) they run at = you know how powerfull it is. Theres no reason for you to be skeptical at all.
If the Switch really was 1Tflop of Fp32, it would be able to run much better looking games (ports) that ran much closer to the Xbox version, than what the switch does now. Logic says your wrong too, if the X-ray chip, and clock speed reads from programs, dont convince you, and verbal confirmation of chip ect.
"Those numbers are wrong AND gflops from nvidea aren't 1:1 with amd. Doom is a rushed port, the switch can run it better than that." - Liquid_Laser
Its not a rushed port.
Those devs worked hard to get it able to run as it does, and put alot of effort into it.
Its crazy they even got it running on the Switch at all.
Also a Flop is a Flop.... only its a theoretical number, so it's not always equal in terms of performance impact.
However even if you give Nvidia (not nvidea) say a 10% edge, that wont make the 396 Gflop Switch able to compete with a 1840 Gflop PS4 in terms of graphical performance.
