"Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance. The only thing it cannot be is moderately important."

[Azuren]

Nem said:

Azuren said:

It's not. It is really not.

 

One decidedly believes there are/is no god/s.

 

The other doesn't deny there could be while also not denying the possibility of them not existing.

 

One definitively takes a side. The other doesn't.

In bold, it's wrong. It's a million times wrong. There is no belief in something that doesn't exist. It's the default position. 

Do you declare you don't believe the pink space unicorn? Flying pigs? Talking butter? No, because it is obvious they don't exist until proven otherwise.

What is so difficult to understand about this? Seriously... the poison they put in your heads... 

The ones that make the claim that god exists are the ones making a claim. The default position of any claim is to not believe it until proven. Therefore believing in the non-existance is completely redundant and doesn't have a part in this. That does not make sense (how could one even prove something doesn't exist?) and is not the definition of Atheism, no matter how much religious people want to misuse it.

No, it's not. It's literally what the name draws from in Latin. Someone who doesn't in believe in a god or multiple gods.