Torillian said:
You seem to argue that the peer review process is a weakness rather than a strength. You utilize colloquial terms like propositions to demean scientific theories and make them seem less credible. Just not things that someone trained in the scientific method would do in my experience. |
acknowledging that something has weaknesses is not the same thing as saying its only a weakness
i acknowledge that there is no better way for mankind to evaluate things, that doesn't mean that its infallible
"You utilize colloquial terms like propositions to demean scientific theories"
i did that with the big bang because the evidence i've seen appears to be way more speculative than with other scientific theories







