By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q said:
Chrizum said:

I don't see any reason for me to continue this. I made my point and your reply only amplifies my doubts about you having even a basic understanding of science and logic. In the other thread about science vs religion I've just now seen you state that scientific theories are just propositions. No one with a academic background would state such an ignorant thing. Thankfully many other posters made you expose yourself as well, for example the excellent rebuttal Aura7541 made in that thread.

The most optimistic scenario is that you're just screwing with everyone to see how far you can go. If so: have fun with it, but I have better things to do.

"In the other thread about science vs religion I've just now seen you state that scientific theories are just propositions. No one with a academic background would state such an ignorant thing."

the definition of theory from dictionary.com

"a coherent group of propositions formulated to explain a group of facts or phenomena in the natural world and repeatedly confirmed through experiment or observation:"

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/scientific-theory

 

what i personally find alarming is that you appear to believe that knowing the definition of a handful of words demonstrates that someone has a scientific background lol

 

"Thankfully many other posters made you expose yourself as well"

expose myself in what way? 

Knowing the difference between a scientific theory on one hand and a belief/faith or "just a proposition" (like anyone could just throw an idea around and call it a scientific theory) on the other is kind of fundamental to understand science.

Either your academic education has failed you greatly or you're just arguing for the sake of arguing, which I find very tiresome so I'll leave you with it.