By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
o_O.Q said:

really? lets say i present findings that show that humans evolved from pigs? would i not be dismissed? is that not selective?

"There is not an order or hierarchy in the scientific community."

what scientist does the general person think of instantly when asked? einstein right? or edison or maybe tesla... how many more can they name?

does that not show that there is a hierarchy where some scientists are more widely respected than others?

"Do you have any idea what peer review is, what it does or how it works?"

what have i posted so far that implies that i do not?

Everything you just said implies you do not understand peer review.....or structure.

so peer review is not selective? lol ok

from google, "the benefit of peer review"

Peer review is a very important process that authors have to go through before they are able to publish their research manuscript. The main purpose is to ensure that whatever comes out published is in its excellent form, i. e., virtually free of errors

 

is rejecting errors a selective process or not... and how do you decide if something is an error or not if you don't have a structure in place for assessment?

Last edited by o_O.Q - on 10 January 2018